Acl 2025 Findings Suggestions. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2023 ACL Anthology Acl 2025 Findings Suggestions Acl 2025 invites the submission of long and short papers featuring substantial, original, and unpublished research in all aspects of computational linguistics and natural The ACL peer-review committee has been working in the past few months to devise ideas on improving the peer-review process in *ACL conferences
ACL实验CSDN博客 from blog.csdn.net
Acl 2025 Findings Suggestions Acl 2025 invites the submission of long and short papers featuring substantial, original, and unpublished research in all aspects of computational linguistics and natural Following the ACL and ARR policies [23], there is no anonymity period requirement
ACL实验CSDN博客
ACL 2025 Findings papers, or other speech, NLP, or MT conferences) Be original: The content of submissions to ACL SRW 2025 (the ideas, the findings, the results and the words) should be original; that is, should not have been published (or be accepted for publication) in another refereed, archival form (such as a book, a journal, or a conference proceedings) Authors who selected ACL 2025 as a preferred venue when submitting to ARR may choose not to commit to ACL 2025 after
Acl Lineup 2025 Weekend 1337x Aurora Jade. ACL 2025 has a goal of a diverse technical program—in addition to traditional research results, papers may contribute negative findings, survey an area, announce the creation of a new resource, argue a position, report novel linguistic insights derived using existing computational techniques, and reproduce, or fail to reproduce, previous results. Be original: The content of submissions to ACL SRW 2025 (the ideas, the findings, the results and the words) should be original; that is, should not have been published (or be accepted for publication) in another refereed, archival form (such as a book, a journal, or a conference proceedings)
Language Modeling with Latent Situations ACL Anthology. The ACL peer-review committee has been working in the past few months to devise ideas on improving the peer-review process in *ACL conferences This year, the number of workshop proposals submitted was a giant increase over previous years, resulting in a very high number of rejections, so we thought it might be useful to write a blog post detailing some of the decisions